Every association executive knows the pressure of non-dues revenue. Membership dues alone usually don’t sustain most organizations, and the traditional non-dues plays — conference sponsorships, advertising in the member publication, certification fees — are getting harder to grow in a landscape where attention is fragmented and budgets are tighter.
That said, there’s a play a lot of associations aren’t making that doesn’t require a new conference or a new product line.
It requires treating the content you’re already producing as an asset rather than an expense. Whether that’s the right move for every organization is genuinely context-dependent, but I think it’s worth exploring and understanding before deciding it’s not for you.
Owned media builds value over time, and associations under pressure to show results in a given budget cycle often can’t justify an investment that takes one to two years (or even longer) to demonstrate ROI.
What Is Owned Media?
Owned media (as opposed to paid media or earned media) is any content channel the organization controls directly — not rented from a social platform, not dependent on a media partner’s distribution, not subject to algorithm changes or advertising rate increases. Your newsletter. Your podcast. Your member-facing content hub. Your conference media presence.
That’s all yours. You didn’t pay someone to provide that coverage. You didn’t have to “earn” it from a news outlet. You own it.
Most associations have some version of this already. The question is whether it’s being treated as a revenue vehicle or purely as a communications expense. There’s no universal right answer there, by the way, because it depends on the audience, the content quality, and the organizational capacity and appetite to sustain it.
The opportunity, where it exists, is to build a content product that’s valuable enough that sponsors want to be adjacent to it, members want to consume it, and non-members see it as a value add all the way up to being a reason to join the association. That’s not a communications function. That’s a business model. But it requires the content to actually be good enough to anchor that kind of value, which not every organization is positioned to do right now.
What This Looked Like in One Case
Among many ideas and things we’ve tried in my time as Director of Marketing at the Society for Simulation in Healthcare, we built the IMSH Pressbox — a member-facing, owned media platform centered on the annual conference. The concept was to create a destination for conference content: coverage, interviews, session highlights, etc. delivered in a way that members and the healthcare simulation industry couldn’t get anywhere else.
What started right after Covid restrictions lifted several years ago as a back-row corner, 10’x10′, “let’s-turn-it-on-and-see-what-happens” booth with a table, backdrop and camera, has evolved into a full broadcast set that most recently had both the regular content we have gotten used to and also product demonstrations in front of live audiences.
Because the content had a real audience and a clear value proposition, it created adjacency opportunities that didn’t exist before. And, because it was mostly-owned infrastructure (we still rent the technical equipment and pay for set setup), we’ve been able to focus on developing the project’s economics to our favor vs. it being a growing net negative like some conference “good ideas” play out over time.
I offer that as one example, not a blueprint.
What worked for a simulation healthcare conference reaching a defined professional audience may not transfer directly to a different association with a different membership profile. The underlying logic, however — sponsors buy relevance, not impressions — probably does transfer. The specific execution is something each organization has to figure out for its own context.
Why Most Associations Haven’t Gone Here
A few reasons tend to come up why associations stop short of trying something that ambitious.
The marketing function is usually resourced for production, not publishing. Building a real content product requires editorial thinking — what story are we telling, for whom, with what cadence — and most association marketing teams are too close to execution (or stuck in the execution rut) to develop that kind of publishing strategy. That’s not failure; it’s capacity.
Also, revenue attribution is hard to establish early. Owned media builds value over time, and associations under pressure to show results in a given budget cycle often can’t justify an investment that takes one to two years (or even longer) to demonstrate ROI. That’s a reasonable position, not an irrational one.
And nobody usually owns it cross-functionally. Owned media that works touches marketing, membership, events, education, or even everyone eventually. In most associations, those functions operate in separate lanes. A content platform without a clear internal owner tends to become an underperforming newsletter that nobody fully cares about — which is worse than not trying, because it still costs time and resources.
Where to Start, If It Makes Sense
The starting point isn’t building a content platform, i.e. a broadcast studio.
It’s an honest assessment of what content your organization already produces that members find genuinely valuable — not just informative, but useful enough that they’d miss it if it disappeared.
If that content exists, there’s a conversation worth having about how to make it better, more consistent, and more deliberately positioned as something sponsors and prospective members could find compelling. If it doesn’t exist yet? Start there.
Most associations are sitting on more content value than they’ve monetized. Whether the gap is a lack of strategy or a lack of capacity is a great question that just might lead to a conversation that just might lead to finding more than a few dollars in the association couch.
Kitchen's Ink 
Leave a comment