Most association marketing departments don’t have a staffing problem. They have a structure problem wearing a staffing problem’s clothes.
Adding headcount to a broken structure produces more output of the same kind and certainly doesn’t produce the strategic shift that most organizations actually need. So, before the conversation is about how many people a marketing department should have, it’s worth understanding what a well-structured department looks like — and why most associations aren’t there.
Look at how your Director of Marketing or Communications spent the last two weeks. Count the hours in each category: thinking work, production work, systems work.
The Work Breaks Down Three Ways
Every marketing function, regardless of size, contains three distinct types of work. They require:
- different skills
- different rhythms
- and different levels of judgment
Thinking work is strategy, positioning, competitive intelligence, campaign architecture, brand decisions, and stakeholder communication.
This is what a Director of Marketing should own almost exclusively. It’s the work that requires organizational context, professional judgment, and cross-functional visibility that no coordinator or vendor can replicate.
Production work is writing, designing, scheduling, publishing, and building. It’s recurring, time-consuming, and largely executable without strategic judgment once a good brief exists.
This is coordinator work — valuable, necessary, and distinct from thinking work in ways that matter for how time gets allocated.
Systems work is the infrastructure: analytics configuration, CRM management, template development, process documentation, vendor coordination. It’s technically specific and requires training and context, but it’s not strategic in the day-to-day sense.
A high-functioning department is one where the Director almost never touches production work and only touches systems work at the direction-and-design level. In most associations, the Director is doing all three.
The Lever That Changes Everything
The single highest-value operational change in a lean marketing department isn’t a new hire. It’s a briefing habit.
Before any production task moves, there’s a brief. Before any campaign launches, there’s a one-page plan. Before any vendor conversation, there’s a written direction document. The brief doesn’t have to be long. It has to answer three questions: who is this for, what do we want them to do or believe, and which organizational priority does this serve?
That habit does three things. It forces the Director to think at the strategic level before the production level — you can’t write a good brief without knowing what you’re trying to accomplish. It creates accountability and alignment without requiring constant oversight. And it builds an institutional archive of intent, so when the organization asks why something was done a certain way, there’s an answer.
The briefing habit is what separates a Director who is perpetually reactive from one who is genuinely leading. Without it, the scope will always exceed the capacity. With it, the department can scale its output without scaling its headcount at the same rate.
The Staff Architecture That Works
For a small-to-mid-size association, the realistic high-functioning model is a three-part structure: a Director who owns strategy and judgment, a coordinator who owns execution and production, and a technical partner (vendor or part-time specialist) who owns systems and infrastructure.
That’s not necessarily three full-time staff members. The technical partner is often a web firm, an analytics consultant, or a fractional specialist. The coordinator may start part-time and grow into full-time as the department’s output increases. The Director is the constant — the person who holds the strategic picture and briefs everyone else.
What breaks this model is when the coordinator role is scoped to cover both execution and technical systems. Those are different skill profiles. Someone strong at content and email execution is unlikely to also be strong at database management and analytics configuration. Asking one person to cover both usually means getting one done well and one done adequately — or neither done fully.
The Question Every Association Should Ask
Look at how your Director of Marketing or Communications spent the last two weeks. Count the hours in each category: thinking work, production work, systems work.
If thinking work is a minority of the total, the structure is wrong. Not because the person is underperforming — but because the organization is paying for strategic leadership and getting production capacity. That gap compounds over time into missed opportunities, reactive positioning, and a marketing function that’s always busy and rarely influential.
The fix isn’t always a new hire.
Sometimes it’s a restructured scope, a vendor relationship, or a briefing process that creates space for the thinking work to happen. But it starts with an honest look at how the time is actually being spent.
Kitchen's Ink 
Leave a comment