Most association communicators are working harder than they need to. Not because they lack skill or effort, but because they have (envisioned?) accepted a role definition that they believe requires them to generate something they cannot: expertise in a profession they did not spend a career practicing.
The moment you stop trying to be both the subject matter expert (SME) and the communicator, the job changes completely. Not because the work gets easier — it doesn’t — but because you instantly relieve yourself of the pressured stress to know everything and instead begin wholly focusing on the part of the project where your own expertise matters.
Communications expertise is not full-knowing the subject matter. It is knowing how to move information from the people who have it to the people who need it, in a form they will actually consume, at a moment when they are ready to act on it.
The Community Already Has Everything You Need
Your members have spent careers developing expertise that other members need. They have lived the stories your content should be telling. They have the credibility with their peers that no staff-written article can replicate. They know the problems your prospective members are sitting with right now, because they were sitting with the same problems two years ago.
That is not a content gap. That is a content goldmine you haven’t fully tapped.
Let’s look at the #AuctionsWork campaign we rolled out at the National Auctioneers Association. That campaign did not work because of what I knew about auctioneering. It worked because I built the infrastructure for auctioneers to tell their own stories — and then got out of the way while the membership ran it.
The expertise was always theirs. My job was to give it some polish, a channel, a frame, and a moment.
What Your Communications Expertise Actually Is
Communications expertise is not full-knowing the subject matter. It is knowing how to move information from the people who have it to the people who need it, in a form they will actually consume, at a moment when they are ready to act on it.
That requires a specific set of skills that most subject matter experts do not have: audience segmentation, channel strategy, message architecture, editorial judgment, timing, voice calibration, and the ability to ask the question that unlocks the insight a practitioner has been carrying for years but has never put into words anyone else could use.
All of that is the “polish” needed to put the finishing touches on the amazing-but-unpolished content from your SMEs. And, those skills are yours.
When you apply them to knowledge that already exists inside your community, the results compound in a way that no amount of solo content production can match. Because you are not limited by what you know. Instead, you are powered by what thousands of members know — and you are the person who knows how to get it where it needs to go.
The Ego Check That Changes Everything
Here is the part nobody says out loud: the impulse to be the expert is often about ego, not quality. Writing a piece yourself feels like control. Sourcing it from a member feels like overhead. Generating your own perspective on a topic your members practice daily feels productive. Spending an hour on a phone call extracting an insight you couldn’t have generated alone feels less like “work.”
That instinct is exactly backwards. The phone call is the leverage. The solo content generation is the ceiling.
Letting go of the expert identity does not diminish the communications role. It clarifies it.
You are not the person who knows the most about simulation or auctioneering or road racing. You are the person who knows which of those insights your members most need right now, how to get them out of the practitioner who has them, and how to place them in the channel where they will produce the most organizational value.
That is a sophisticated, high-leverage professional role. It just does not look like what most people imagine “content creation” looks like.
What This Frees Up
When you stop trying to generate expertise you do not have, you get something back: time and mental space for the work that actually requires your specific skills.
Instead of producing a mediocre practitioner-facing article from your own limited vantage point, you spend 30 minutes building the interview framework that will produce a great one from the member who has the vantage point you need. Instead of writing copy about a certification program you understand only from the outside, you spend that time on the channel strategy that gets a credentialed member’s first-person account in front of the audience who is on the fence about pursuing it.
The output is better because it is grounded in real expertise. Your time is better spent because you are doing the work that requires your skills rather than the work that requires someone else’s. And the member who contributed their knowledge has a reason to share it — because it represents them accurately and makes them look good in front of their peers.
Building the Infrastructure for It
None of this happens by accident. It requires a deliberate system for identifying the expertise in your community, building relationships with the people who hold it, and creating consistent processes for extracting and deploying it.
That means mapping your SME landscape: who in this organization has knowledge that other members most need, in what domains, and how do you maintain enough of a relationship with them that they will give you thirty minutes when you need them? It means building interview habits that consistently produce usable content rather than unusable transcripts. It means knowing, for each piece of community knowledge you surface, exactly which channel it belongs in and which audience segment it serves.
That infrastructure is the job. Not the content itself — the system that produces content better than you could produce alone, at a scale that compounds over time, because the community is generating it and you are deploying it.
Your expertise is the multiplier. Theirs is the base. Get clear on which is which, and the ceiling on what a lean communications function can produce goes away entirely.
Kitchen's Ink 
Leave a comment